Light and darkness. Yin and Yang. Venus
and Mars. Optimist or pessimist--half full or half empty. Protagonist and
antagonist. A fantasy writer seeks out the duality at the core of any story
line. Really, who wants to read a story about good and good? Despite the spin,
it’s a binary world. Things do or don’t happen, and are or are not. As Yoda
succinctly explained, “Do or do not, there is no try.”
Duality is everywhere, if one knows what
to look for. Take numbers for example. Absolutes, right? Not necessarily.
January U.S. labor figures came out showing substantial and continuous job
growth. According to the commentators on channel 47, it’s good news. However,
according to the talking heads on channel 48, it’s horrendous news. In fact,
according to some of the talking heads, the numbers aren’t even real (which
makes no sense since there are no “i”’s next to the reported numbers). Same
numbers. Go figure. On deeper reflection, though, one should hardly be
surprised. In the US, an octodecillion is a one followed by fifty-seven zeros.
In Britain, the same number is one followed by 108 zeros. Similarly, a
vigintillion is one followed by sixty-three zeros in the US, and 120 zeros in
Britain.
One is the identity number. Number one
gets parades and cereal box covers. Number two, well, who remembers who took
the silver medal in women’s curling in Nagano in 1998? Gotcha, it was a trick
question. Denmark took the silver, but it was their first medal in winter
Olympic history, a fortiori, an event
memorable because it was a number one. Generally speaking, however, number two
fades rapidly into the mists of memory.
Two is twice one, and serves as the basis
for our binary world, yet doesn’t even appear in base two. In base ten, we call
“10” “ten”. In base two, we call “10” “two”, but does it look like a two to
you? Of course not. It is a classic case of appearance versus reality, a
fundamental precept in fantasy writing, which mercifully finally brings us to
the point.
Writing is the product of a continuous
subconscious stream of binary choices. At each step, the Muse is checking off
countless boxes with yeses and noes. Each yes or no has consequences for the
story which affect the story’s appearance, and thus, the reader’s willingness
to suspend disbelief and accept your character’s actions.
Let’s build a fantasy character. Right off
the bat, the binary computer goes to work. Since we’re dealing with fantasy,
question one is whether or not the character is animate? Check “yes” or “no”.
If “yes”, continue to question two. Is the character human? Jumping ahead, we’ve
checked “animate-yes”, “human-yes”, “female-yes” and after several dozen more
questions, we have “Mackenzie”, age 18, blonde, hair to mid back, C cup bra,
honors student, lives with parents,sings in her church choir-soprano.
As Mackenzie stepped forward for her solo, he spied the
dark stranger sliding into the last
pew. Smiling, she....
She what? Well, that depends on a number
of binary choices. What is Mackenzie’s basic character, sacred or profane? If your Muse checked “yes” for “sacred”, it
is unlikely that upon viewing the dark stranger, Mackenzie felt her nipples
harden and developed a tingling between her legs. More likely, “Smiling, she
felt (‘joy’, ‘love’, ‘compassion’, ‘hope’, ‘vindication’)...” Conversely, why
is the dark stranger there? Does he have designs on Mackenzie? Yes. Does he
mean her harm? No. Does he want her sexually? No (at least not yet). Ultimately,
the reader will learn that the dark stranger is there to save Mackenzie from
the visiting imposter Episcopalian clergyman who, in fact, is really Formorii
(Irish nasties--defeated at the Second Battle of Magh Tuireadh, but I digress).
The writer’s job is to get the story
down in black and white. Like my holiday gift tee shirt says, “Even if it’s
crap, just get it on the page.” Once it’s down, then the writer can go back and
check the Muse’s decision making process, and flip the occasional yes to no or
no to yes until the story has the appropriate appearance. Once that is done,
the binary choice flips over to the reader who will like it or not. The rest is
just commentary.
CK Copyright 2/7/12; Moral rights to be identified as the author of the
foregoing article asserted worldwide (including in Great Britain in accordance
with Sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act of 1988) (See
prior blog on Moral Rights).
No comments:
Post a Comment